French grimoire print history · Wellcome b33030169

Grand Grimoire / Dragon Rouge: Dates, Editions, and Lucifuge

The Grand Grimoire survives behind a false 1521 imprint, an Antonio Venitiana signature, Lucifuge’s pact hierarchy, and shifting French print witnesses.

STAR & SIGIL

Browse the Star & Sigil spellbook library

Open the spellbook library

A family of French print witnesses survives under the title Grand Grimoire; it has no single fixed form. Grand Grimoire, Dragon Rouge, and Véritable Dragon Rouge can name overlapping texts, while individual editions change titles, signatures, illustrations, companions, and dates.

Printed languageFrench
Wellcome witness[1521 [i.e. 1850?]
Digital object116 images · Public Domain Mark

Explore the reading room

Four labels that should stay precise

Le Grand Grimoire

A title attached to an illustrated BnF witness catalogued as 1702 and to later reprints. The record notes that closely related text also circulated as Le Dragon Rouge.

Le Dragon Rouge

A title used for the French grimoire tradition studied through late eighteenth- and nineteenth-century references and editions.

Le véritable Dragon Rouge

The wording on the Wellcome joint volume, whose printed 1521 year is catalogued as a probable false date for an edition around 1850.

La Poule noire

A separate grimoire placed after the Dragon Rouge in the Wellcome volume. Its own heading begins on numbered page 103.

Start with the surviving object

The Wellcome copy preserves the discrepancy. Its title page prints 1521, yet the catalogue supplies “[i.e. 1850?]” and leaves both place and publisher uncertain. The same object has two unnumbered preliminary leaves, 108 numbered pages, a frontispiece, and woodcut illustrations. Its IIIF manifest contains 116 canvas images because the digitization includes covers and other views outside the numbered sequence. A date printed inside the book and a library’s estimate for the physical edition are different kinds of evidence.

The frontispiece joins a red dragon to a black hen, previewing the two titles sold together. Farther inside, a horned figure and sign visualize the book’s Lucifuge episode. Near the end, a fresh heading and hen woodcut open the Black Pullet. The images follow the publisher’s sequence: title, spectacle, narrative authority, and appended attraction. They also keep the claims attached to a specific witness rather than turning every woodcut into an emblem shared by all editions.

Selected witnesses and reference points
DateEvidenceWhat it establishes
1702BnF Grand Grimoire recordA catalogued 84-page witness under the Grand Grimoire title
By 1818Mention traced by Papot-LibéralThe Dragon Rouge title tradition was circulating by this point
1823 / 1838Nîmes and Paris witnesses in the edition studyEarly nineteenth-century print states with changing titles
About 1850Wellcome work qss4ugsfThe joint Dragon Rouge and Black Pullet volume falsely dated 1521
1873BnF record, V. Goupy, ParisA later expanded joint edition available through Gallica

What the Grand Grimoire claims to contain

The work presents an infernal administration headed by Lucifer, Beelzebub, and Astaroth. Lucifuge Rofocale appears as a first minister associated with riches and hidden treasure. Other named figures receive military or courtly offices and specialized powers. The pact narrative stages negotiation and coercion through that hierarchy. These are roles asserted by the printed text, not observations about a verifiable supernatural order.

Christian sacred names, inherited Solomonic authority, fragments of several languages, diagrams, signatures, and commercial promises share the page. Grimoires typically compile and reframe older material in this mixture. The operator is written as compelling spirits through superior names, so the book’s religious logic is more complicated than a simple manual of devotion to the devil. Its organization can be studied without repeating its operational directions.

The BnF’s 1873 Goupy record shows how the package grew: Dragon Rouge and Black Pullet appear together with added “secrets.” The Wellcome witness probably predates it, while the BnF Grand Grimoire record catalogued as 1702 represents another state. Their differences as witnesses explain the false date, author signature, and changing contents.

Catalogue records and research