The first two Angelical Calls appear as paired phrase units. Every result retains its Call number and order, keeping a familiar word attached to the passage that gives it meaning.
49 SOURCE UNITS · CALLS 1–2
Search the phrase concordance
Search Angelical spelling or the accompanying English. Results stay attached to their Call and order.
49 phrase units
OL sonuf vaoresaji
I reign over you
gohu IAD Balata
says the God of Justice
elanusaha caelazod
in power exalted above the firmament of wrath
sobra zod-ol
in whose hands
Roray i ta nazodapesad
the Sun is as a sword
Giraa ta maelpereji
the Moon as a penetrating fire
das hoel-qo
who measures
qaa notahoa zodimezod
your garments in the midst of my vestures
od comemahe ta nobeloha zodien
and bound you together as the palms of my hands
soba tahil
whose seats
ginonupe pereje aladi
are garnished with the fire of gathering
das vaurebes
who beautified
obolehe giresam
your garments with admiration
Casarem ohorela caba Pire
to whom I made a law to govern the holy ones
das zodonurenusagi cab
who delivered you a rod
erem Iadanahe
with the ark of knowledge
Pilahe farezodem zodenurezoda
moreover you lifted your voices and swore
adana gono Iadpiel das home-tohe
obedience and faith to the one who lives and triumphs
soba ipame
whose beginning is not
lu ipamis
whose end cannot be
das sobolo vepe zodomeda poamal
which shines as a flame in your palaces
od bogipa aai ta piape
and reigns among you as the balance
Piamoel od Vaoan
of righteousness and truth
Zodacare, eca, od zodameranu
move, therefore, and show yourselves
odo cicale Qaa
open the mysteries of creation
zodoreje
be friendly unto me
lape zodiredo
for I am
Noco Mada
a servant of the same God
Hoathahe IAIDA
a true worshipper of the Highest
ADAGITA vau-pa-ahe zodonugonu fa-a-ipe salada
can the wings of the winds understand your voices of wonder
Vi-i-vau el
O you, the second of the first
Sobame ial-pereji i-zoda-zodazod pi-adapehe
whom burning flames framed in the depths of my jaws
casarema
whom
aberameji ta ta-labo paracaleda
I prepared as cups for a wedding
qo-ta lores-el-qo turebesa
or as flowers in their beauty
ooge balatohe
for the chamber of righteousness
Giui cahisa lusada oreri
stronger are your feet than barren stone
od micalapape cahisa bia ozodonugonu
and mightier your voices than the manifold winds
lape noanu tarofe coresa tage o-quo maninu IA-I-DON
for you became a building found only in the mind of the All-Powerful
Torezodu
arise
gohe-el
says the First
zodacare
move
eca
therefore
ca-no-quoda
unto his servants
zodameranu
show yourselves
micalazodo od ozodazodame
in power and make me
vaurelape
a strong seer
lape zodir
of things, for I am of him
IOIAD
who lives forever
No phrase unit matches that search.
Why this is a concordance rather than a universal dictionary
A modern dictionary normally promises that a headword can be lifted out of one sentence and carried into another with a stable definition. The surviving Angelical material does not support that promise at ordinary dictionary scale. Dee’s record preserves a limited corpus, and the most accessible printed parallel text gives an Angelical passage beside a much more expansive English rendering. This tool therefore searches phrase units: short stretches divided by sense and punctuation, each tied to its original Call and sequence.
The difference matters immediately. In the first Call, gohu IAD Balata is rendered as a complete reporting clause about the God of Justice. Isolating gohu as though it always meant one modern English word would hide the root family visible elsewhere: gohe, gohia, gohol, and gohulim appear with related ideas of saying or speech. The family is evidence of patterned formation, but the endings do not behave consistently enough to become a full conjugation table.
The rows below follow the spelling printed in The Equinox I:8 in 1912. Hyphens, capitalization, and apparent word boundaries are editorial features of that witness. Other editions normalize several forms differently. A search result should be read as “this phrase occurs here with this accompanying English,” rather than “every token has this fixed definition.”
What the first two Calls reveal
The first Call moves through images of rule, light, garments, law, knowledge, obedience, and revelation. Its opening places sovereignty in the speaker, then describes the Sun as a sword and the Moon as a penetrating fire. The sequence later turns from description to command: Zodacare, eca, od zodameranu is paired with “move, therefore, and show yourselves.” Because the imperative cluster recurs, readers can compare a phrase in context instead of treating a single occurrence as proof.
The second Call begins with a question about winds and voices, builds a series of images around flames, cups, flowers, stone, and a structure held in divine understanding, then ends with imperatives and a request to become a strong seer. Several pieces overlap with the first Call: zodacare, eca, and zodameranu recur. Their repetition is stronger evidence than a lone gloss because position and function can be compared across passages.
The 1912 issue describes the first Call as 86 Angelical words against 169 in the English rendering. That imbalance is not a defect in the search tool; it is one of the most important facts the tool displays. The accompanying English often unfolds compact Angelical units into clauses with articles, possessives, and explanatory phrases. A word-for-word layout would falsely imply alignments the witness does not give.
How to read spelling and repeated forms
Search is intentionally forgiving about case and punctuation, but it does not silently rewrite the source text. A search for zodacare finds the combined unit in Call 1 and the shorter unit in Call 2. A search for “justice” finds the English side of the opening clause. These two paths support different questions: form search locates recurrence, while English search locates where an editor assigned an idea.
Some printed spellings are visibly composite. Forms such as zod-ol, ca-no-quoda, and IA-I-DON preserve hyphenation that may suggest components, pronunciation guidance, or editorial analysis. The concordance keeps those marks so a visitor can compare the exact printed unit. Removing them would make search cleaner but would erase evidence about the edition.
For a wider view, compare the grammar analysis with the Keys and Logaeth comparison. The former tests recurring forms; the latter explains why material from Liber Logaeth should not be poured into the same vocabulary list as the translated Calls without marking the boundary.